AD654 ยท Marketing Analytics ยท Spring 2026

Stay & Play at Lobster Land ๐Ÿฆž

A data-driven blueprint for Lobster Land's expansion into on-site lodging โ€” from guest segmentation and conjoint design to classification of premium-package buyers.

The Brief

From day-trippers to overnight guests

Lobster Land's gates have been busy โ€” but most guests come, ride, eat, and leave. Management wants to know: could a hotel keep them around?

Borrowing pages from Disney and Universal's "stay and play" playbook, the park is weighing three lodging concepts: a modest family hotel, a premium coastal resort, or a tiered hybrid. Our team was hired as analytical consultants to figure out which guests would actually book, what package features they want, and how much it should cost.

This site is a tour of what we found.

0
Guest Segments
Identified
0
Classifier
Accuracy
0
Per-Guest
Cost Cap
0
Analytical
Workstreams
Segmentation & Targeting

Who's already in the park?

A K-Means model on ten numeric guest variables (income, party size, distance traveled, experience preferences) surfaced four distinct personas. We chose k = 4 on business grounds โ€” the silhouette and elbow plots didn't disagree, and four clusters give management a manageable, distinguishable set of guest types.

๐Ÿจ

Current Overnight Guests

2.91 avg nights stayed

The only segment actually booking rooms today. Balanced taste โ€” rides, shows, food. A "jack of all trades" guest already paying to stay.

Priority: High ยท Retention
๐ŸŽญ

Mature Show-Goers

$$$ highest daily spend

Older, small parties, culture-focused. They prefer shows over rides and spend big โ€” but currently come and go in a single day.

Priority: Medium ยท Premium
๐Ÿš—

Long-Haul Family Travelers

171 mi average distance

Largest parties, longest drives, highest household incomes โ€” but tight per-day budgets. Natural overnight candidates from a logistics standpoint.

Priority: Med-High ยท Volume
๐Ÿค

Young Frequent Foodies

โ˜… highest stay intent

Youngest, most frequent visitors, food-obsessed. They say they'd stay overnight โ€” but rarely do. The biggest gap between intent and behavior.

Priority: High ยท Conversion
Where to focus: Current Overnight Guests defend existing revenue. Young Frequent Foodies are the conversion play โ€” they already want to stay, they just need a reason that fits their wallet (and their Instagram feed).
Conjoint Analysis

Designing the package

We ran a ratings-based conjoint on stay_options.csv, joined the part-worth utilities to vendor costs, and brute-forced every possible bundle. Goal: maximize utility under the $150 per-guest cost cap finance handed us.

Recommended Bundle

The Lobster Land Signature Stay

~$148 / guest just under cap
๐Ÿ›๏ธ
Premium View Roomwater- or park-facing
๐Ÿ“ถ
Streaming Wi-Fi (300 Mbps)multi-device, high bandwidth
๐Ÿง˜
Basic Fitness Roomcardio + weights โ€” fitness rated low utility
๐Ÿฝ๏ธ
Breakfast + Dining Creditsbalanced food perk, sub-cap
โฐ
Early Check-In / Late Check-Outcheap utility lift
๐Ÿš
Shuttle to Park + Townextends the experience beyond the gate
๐ŸŽข
Priority Ride Accesshighest-utility perk in its category

Trade-offs: we left fitness at the basic tier (utility lift wasn't worth the $40+ cost) and skipped the Luxury Suite (Premium View beat it on utility per dollar). Every cent saved went into perks guests actually rated highly.

Classification

Who actually buys premium?

We trained Logistic Regression and Random Forest on stay_play_guests.csv to predict premium-package purchase. The Random Forest hit 94% on training data but cratered to 67% on test โ€” textbook overfitting. Logistic Regression won.

Selected

Logistic Regression

71.8%Test Accuracy
68.7%Train Accuracy
+16.4 ppvs. naive baseline

Generalizes cleanly โ€” test accuracy slightly above train, no overfitting, interpretable coefficients.

Random Forest

66.7%Test Accuracy
94.2%Train Accuracy
โˆ’27.5 pptrain-test gap

Memorized the training set. Even after GridSearchCV tuning, the gap stayed too wide to trust.

Top predictors of premium purchase

  • Stay intent score โ€” buyers averaged 5.57 vs. 4.44 for non-buyers
  • Income โ€” buyers earned ~$89k vs. ~$77k
  • Average daily spend โ€” wallet behavior in-park predicts wallet behavior at the front desk
  • Distance traveled & nights already stayed
  • Segment 1 ("Ride Enthusiasts") behaved differently enough to keep as a feature
A/B Testing

Which photo sells the dream?

Lobster Land licensed four hero images for an email campaign. We used appropriate statistical tests to compare engagement and recommend a winner.

Winner
๐ŸŒ…

Ocean Lodging

Couple, ocean view from room

๐Ÿ–๏ธ

Boardwalk Fun

Daytime crowd, balconies

โ›ฑ๏ธ

Beach Side

Lounge chairs, family beach

๐ŸŒƒ

Night Glow

Resort exterior, golden hour

Average Conversion Rate by Image

๐ŸŒ… Ocean Lodging
1.03%
๐Ÿ–๏ธ Boardwalk Fun
0.74%
โ›ฑ๏ธ Beach Side
0.47%
๐ŸŒƒ Night Glow
0.39%
๐Ÿ“Š
ANOVA Test

p-value > 0.05 โ€” no statistically significant difference across images.

Recommendation: go with Ocean Lodging. ANOVA didn't surface a statistically significant difference, but Ocean Lodging still posted the highest average conversion at 1.03% โ€” more than 2.5ร— Night Glow. Even a small lift compounds at scale, so picking the best-performing creative is still the right business call. More data could confirm whether the edge holds up over time.
Behind the Analysis

The team

A graduate student consulting team out of Boston University's MS in Applied Business Analytics program.

๐Ÿฆž

Omar

Segmentation lead

๐Ÿฆž

Lee

Conjoint & recommendation

๐Ÿฆž

Nutchanon

Classification

๐Ÿฆž

Naqiao

A/B testing & viz